HorrorMovieFans.com

Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:29 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:24 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:05 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:02 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 12:56 pm where has vivek ramaswamy gone?

No idea. What have you heard

i hear that he's running for governor in ohio. good doge!

Good luck. Maybe J-Mac will vote for him.

I haven't seen him around here in a long time.

Everybody goes missing for a while. Even me.

Insanely dishonest.

"more than 8,000 usaid employees were sent home by the administration" is the important part. the gripe about 60 minutes putting consultants on camera, rather than employees is to draw attention away from what actually matters.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:02 pm "more than 8,000 usaid employees were sent home by the administration" is the important part. the gripe about 60 minutes putting consultants on camera, rather than employees is to draw attention away from what actually matters.

The important part is they couldn't even find any real USAID employees to participate in their hoax. The reason they couldn't is because our tax dollars were funding that place. The audit showed that USAID was used as a money laundering entity for political kickbacks.

This is the only form of cancel culture I can get behind.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:07 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:02 pm "more than 8,000 usaid employees were sent home by the administration" is the important part. the gripe about 60 minutes putting consultants on camera, rather than employees is to draw attention away from what actually matters.

The important part is they couldn't even find any real USAID employees to participate in their hoax. The reason they couldn't is because our tax dollars were funding that place. The audit showed that USAID was used as a money laundering entity for political kickbacks.

This is the only form of cancel culture I can get behind.

you don't think they had employees because they were funded by tax dollars? i mean, maybe so. but i have not anything to suggest or support that myself.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:15 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:07 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:02 pm "more than 8,000 usaid employees were sent home by the administration" is the important part. the gripe about 60 minutes putting consultants on camera, rather than employees is to draw attention away from what actually matters.

The important part is they couldn't even find any real USAID employees to participate in their hoax. The reason they couldn't is because our tax dollars were funding that place. The audit showed that USAID was used as a money laundering entity for political kickbacks.

This is the only form of cancel culture I can get behind.

you don't think they had employees because they were funded by tax dollars? i mean, maybe so. but i have not anything to suggest or support that myself.

I'm not sure what you mean? I'm not saying people weren't laid off, I'm saying the people in the 60 Minutes video were not even real employees of USAID.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:17 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:15 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:07 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:02 pm "more than 8,000 usaid employees were sent home by the administration" is the important part. the gripe about 60 minutes putting consultants on camera, rather than employees is to draw attention away from what actually matters.

The important part is they couldn't even find any real USAID employees to participate in their hoax. The reason they couldn't is because our tax dollars were funding that place. The audit showed that USAID was used as a money laundering entity for political kickbacks.

This is the only form of cancel culture I can get behind.

you don't think they had employees because they were funded by tax dollars? i mean, maybe so. but i have not anything to suggest or support that myself.

I'm not sure what you mean? I'm not saying people weren't laid off, I'm saying the people in the 60 Minutes video were not even real employees of USAID.

oh okay.. the pointing at the two people on camera and 60 minutes' dishonesty is to distract from firing of employees. that's what i said. i thought you were refuting it.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:19 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:17 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:15 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:07 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:02 pm "more than 8,000 usaid employees were sent home by the administration" is the important part. the gripe about 60 minutes putting consultants on camera, rather than employees is to draw attention away from what actually matters.

The important part is they couldn't even find any real USAID employees to participate in their hoax. The reason they couldn't is because our tax dollars were funding that place. The audit showed that USAID was used as a money laundering entity for political kickbacks.

This is the only form of cancel culture I can get behind.

you don't think they had employees because they were funded by tax dollars? i mean, maybe so. but i have not anything to suggest or support that myself.

I'm not sure what you mean? I'm not saying people weren't laid off, I'm saying the people in the 60 Minutes video were not even real employees of USAID.

oh okay.. the pointing at the two people on camera and 60 minutes' dishonesty is to distract from firing of employees. that's what i said. i thought you were refuting it.

Well, I'm glad those people in USAID who were fired are no longer laundering my tax dollars to totally weird and unnecessary foreign programs and giving themselves kickbacks.

if you want to insinuate, show me an actual link to verify that instead of only some image that claims it.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 2:33 pm if you want to insinuate, show me an actual link to verify that instead of only some image that claims it.

The problem with Elizabeth Warren is she is caught in so many easily traceable lies that it's all but certain she is involved in the USAID scandal. As far as her net worth, it's impossible to tell an exact figure but she estimated to have at least 12 million dollars despite a lower end six-figure salary. She claimed she never received money from pharmaceutical companies or PACs and in an instant it's verifiable (link below). And Musk announced a few days ago that they discovered so much corruption in many government programs that DOGE is now going to begin an investigation into politicians with substantial net worth despite low-end six-figure salaries. Warren will be investigated. Fauci will be investigated. It looks like it's all going to come out very soon.

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/ ... ortorder=U
https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of- ... =N00033492

Look what was discovered yesterday. lol.

12 million is not 67 million, and also not verified with a link. if she's caught up in fraud somewhere, bring it out. but honesty is important even against people we don't like.

394 million people collecting social security in America despite the population having a total of about 334 million people of all ages.

How?

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:12 pm 12 million is not 67 million, and also not verified with a link. if she's caught up in fraud somewhere, bring it out. but honesty is important even against people we don't like.

Honesty is very important, so she should quit openly lying and then refuse to answer when faced with real questions. Makes her look really really bad and extremely suspect.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:14 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:12 pm 12 million is not 67 million, and also not verified with a link. if she's caught up in fraud somewhere, bring it out. but honesty is important even against people we don't like.

Honesty is very important, so she should quit openly lying and then refuse to answer when faced with real questions. Makes her look really really bad and extremely suspect.

indeed. she should be transparent and open with the media, as should anyone else. but she does have a right to shout "fake news!" at them and run away, as much as anyone else does.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:13 pm 394 million people collecting social security in America despite the population having a total of about 334 million people of all ages.

How?

probably only receiving it on paper, not in actuality. we have no way to know for sure. but musk does. he could look into it and find out but that woeldn't be a good distraction.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:13 pm 394 million people collecting social security in America despite the population having a total of about 334 million people of all ages.

How?

A lot of social security checks are cut and cashed by people who are not the beneficiary nor eligible. Children or spouses etc. cashing checks owed to the long dead.

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:35 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:13 pm 394 million people collecting social security in America despite the population having a total of about 334 million people of all ages.

How?

A lot of social security checks are cut and cashed by people who are not the beneficiary nor eligible. Children or spouses etc. cashing checks owed to the long dead.

The list you're seeing is from people who are marked alive.

And 131 million people under the age of 30 are eligible for social security.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:38 pm

Reign in Blood wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:35 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:13 pm 394 million people collecting social security in America despite the population having a total of about 334 million people of all ages.

How?

A lot of social security checks are cut and cashed by people who are not the beneficiary nor eligible. Children or spouses etc. cashing checks owed to the long dead.

The list you're seeing is from people who are marked alive.

What list am I seeing? It looks like an excel spreadsheet straight from a cybertruck's ass and nothing more.