Recent Entries
| |
 |
(Reviewed by Snake-666) - Not quite as bad as I thought
it would be. This film, directed by Greg Huson, is about a group
of teenagers (oh joy) who go away for the weekend to a disused ski-resort
that apparently one of the teenager's fathers is planning to buy.
In echoes of such campsite slashers as Friday the 13th it seems that this
deserted ski-resort is not deserted, a strange skier in black seems to glide
around the slopes.
It's a shame this movie started off so badly as the last twenty minutes are
pretty good fare for a teen-slasher. Much of this movie was bad, badly
directed, badly acted and badly scripted.
Kimberley (played by Lindsey McKeon from 'Saved By The Bell: The New Class'
"fame") put in one of the better, but still poor, performances but
often seemed like she was forcing the words. However, she was playing a
character that was trying to be seen as someone to detest, which she managed
to pull off for a small while so credit for that. Of course, one may think
that is due to the script, but no...There is so much useless dialogue and so
much
lack of useful dialogue that it's hard to actually understand what's going
on. At times it seemed like the actors were improvising. It all makes sense
eventually, but you do have to look for your answers.
Except for one thing that is, towards the beginning of the film on their way
to the resort, the teens stop off at a service station. After a girlie chat
in the bathroom the girls run into a European guy named Christophe (Brad
Hawkins). After talking with him for a couple of minutes they invite him
along. One question - why?! How many women are there out there who would do
that? I'm sure even the girls out there that act like Kimberley does in this
film wouldn't do that. But anyway, I digress a tad.
Another problem with the film is the way they introduce the characters.
Almost all the other characters in the film suddenly just make an appearance
and then come back much later. Also the acting abilities of these extra
characters (especially a pervy Sheriff) was highly questionable. For the
short time that they are on screen though it doesn't really matter.
The directing for most of 'Shredder' was sub-par but, having said that,
there were a couple of quite well done ski-chase scenes. They were fast
paced and aesthetically good. I must also mention that there were some good
scenery shots of the snowy mountains. Huson adopted an MTV-style approach to
the direction which was mostly an annoyance. It seemed that there were
(towards the beginning) many filler scenes which served no purpose to the
script just so punk-pop music could be played on the soundtrack. Whether
this is his style I don't know having not seen his only other film as a
director, 'Decaf', and according to it's IMDb page, no one else has either.
The make-up quality was inconsistent. Sometimes the make-up is quite good,
fairly realistic looking and quite gory but othertimes it is extremely fake
looking and poorly done. The quality of the make-up generally improves later
in the film, so maybe two different guys were doing the effects? Thankfully
though, apart from a quick and unfortunately cartoony image at the end no
CGI was used.
What's most important is the actual film though and like I mentioned
previously, the ending helped salvage it. The first hour of the film is
where most of the problems I've mentioned can be found. The last twenty
minutes on the other hand seemed fairly well thought out. Admittedly there
were a few consistency problems and the lack of previous and current
interaction between the teenagers and the other characters in the film
harmed the quality somewhat but I still have to give some credit where it's
due. If the film had been given an extra 10-15 minutes, or hadn't used so
much filler, it could have been improved. It's the lack of understanding
that begins through the non-development of the characters and ideas that's
the problem. A little more character interaction and some extra dialogue
would have made everything much more plausible and coherent. Another thing
that shamed the ending was the quick array of plot twists that were tried.
None really worked well and unfortunately it made things a little sloppy.
There were some good suspense scenes and a few moments that might increase
your heart-rate but this film isn't really scary. Also, despite being a
small gore content, most of the killings are either off-screen or a camera
turn which flicks back to the finished result.
Will I watch this again? Yes, probably. I wouldn't say it's worth checking
out (I definately wouldn't go out of your way) but there are much worse
films out there. At least the last twenty minutes somewhat helped to salvage
the film, though not entirely fixing the mess the first hour made the film
definately upped it's rating from me in that time. If you see it and like
the sound of it then you should check it out. Think 'Friday the 13th' with
less of a story and set at a ski-resort and your getting close here. I'd say
5.5/10 |
 |
(Reviewed by Preppy) - Very good for what it is. An
annoying bunch of 20 somethings go to spend a weekend at an abandoned ski
resort. They plan to go "shredding" (snow boarding) and whoop it
up. All the stereotypes are in place: the nice girl; his girlfriend; the
female slut; the maybe lesbian; the crazy "funny" guy; the
constantly stoned guy and the mysterious European guy they pick up along the
way. Also the "funny" crazy guy is constantly videotaping
everything and we get extremely annoying, jarring cuts to his footage. This
has quickly become a cliché since "The Blair Witch Project". Can
we put it to rest now? It also seems the resort was the site of an unsolved
murder...and there are rumors that the killer is still around...
It all starts out great with a bloody, gruesome murder...then falls apart
quick. All the characters are annoying with the girls constantly prancing
around in their underwear and being used (and filmed) as sex objects. Some
people have complained that there wasn't enough female nudity in this film.
Well...you know what? Not EVERYBODY wants female nudity in a horror film! As
a gay man I find it boring and pointless. This film deserves credit for not
having too much. And they do have hunky handsome Brad Hawkins shirtless a
lot! That's a good thing. Also we have to wait 40 minutes in till the next
murder. There's also a really stupid final revelation at the end and I love
how a dead person mysteriously is alive at the end! On the good side: the
acting isn't bad. That's surprising in a film like this. The best acting
comes from Hawkins and Juleah Weikes. The only bad performance is from Scott
Weinger. It's not entirely his fault...he's given little to work with but he
does try. And there are a few very amusing lines. At one point Cole (Weinger)
is constantly accusing one person of being the murderer. When they find that
person dead he say's "All right--it's not him. Let's get out of
here!" Also when a woman finds some dead bodies in the basement she
goes screaming upstairs. Pike (Weikes) confronts her saying, "For
future reference, the next time we're stalked by a serial killer do NOT go
into the basement." Also the murders are VERY violent and incredibly
bloody (I mean this as a good thing). The film also really picks up speed
and the final half hour is good, fast and violent. The film has high
production values (for a direct to video feature). It has some nice
direction during the shredding episodes and the cinematography is nice,
clear and crisp.
A lot of people have blasted this film but...come on! It's a direct to video
horror film! What were they expecting? "Gone With the Wind?" It's
a fairly good, fast horror flick. Worth a rental but don't go out of your
way to see it. 5/10 |
| |
Become a friend of
HorrorMovieFans.com at these social networking sites

|