<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selling Horror to the Fans Part 1:  Shilling</title>
	<link>http://www.horrormoviefans.com/newsblog/2009/03/15/selling-horror-to-the-fans-part-1-shilling/</link>
	<description>For Fans, By Fans.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Olsson</title>
		<link>http://www.horrormoviefans.com/newsblog/2009/03/15/selling-horror-to-the-fans-part-1-shilling/#comment-28074</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Olsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.horrormoviefans.com/newsblog/2009/03/15/selling-horror-to-the-fans-part-1-shilling/#comment-28074</guid>
		<description>It is really disingenous to the viewers. If you look at many fan message boards and the imdb board for the new Friday they were putting up reviews from Bloody-Disgusting.com and JoBlo.com because they felt they could trust them more than mainstream critics. This article proves you can't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really disingenous to the viewers. If you look at many fan message boards and the imdb board for the new Friday they were putting up reviews from Bloody-Disgusting.com and JoBlo.com because they felt they could trust them more than mainstream critics. This article proves you can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ISUsycamore81</title>
		<link>http://www.horrormoviefans.com/newsblog/2009/03/15/selling-horror-to-the-fans-part-1-shilling/#comment-27984</link>
		<dc:creator>ISUsycamore81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.horrormoviefans.com/newsblog/2009/03/15/selling-horror-to-the-fans-part-1-shilling/#comment-27984</guid>
		<description>While I agree, they were probably coaxed and coached on what they could say. I have to say for once they weren't too far off on the quality of the movie. Not perfect by any means, but still a fun 90 minutes. Ranks number 6 after the first 5 for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree, they were probably coaxed and coached on what they could say. I have to say for once they weren&#8217;t too far off on the quality of the movie. Not perfect by any means, but still a fun 90 minutes. Ranks number 6 after the first 5 for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reign in Blood</title>
		<link>http://www.horrormoviefans.com/newsblog/2009/03/15/selling-horror-to-the-fans-part-1-shilling/#comment-27982</link>
		<dc:creator>Reign in Blood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.horrormoviefans.com/newsblog/2009/03/15/selling-horror-to-the-fans-part-1-shilling/#comment-27982</guid>
		<description>I am sure all the same websites will be sucking off the NOES remake like a Hoover when their set visits happen, and spewing out the cum all over the place. "I can't talk about how PD took a dump in Freddy's fedora and made him wear it, but rest assured, this will be one of the best horror movies of next year!".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure all the same websites will be sucking off the NOES remake like a Hoover when their set visits happen, and spewing out the cum all over the place. &#8220;I can&#8217;t talk about how PD took a dump in Freddy&#8217;s fedora and made him wear it, but rest assured, this will be one of the best horror movies of next year!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

