HorrorMovieFans.com

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:43 pm And 131 million people under the age of 30 are eligible for social security.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 4:18 pm i wanna have an age bucket. and twilight is the vampire movie he thinks of? he is such a softy.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 4:14 pm Well, I don't know about you sir, but the fact we have people still alive in this country who have been alive longer than this country has been established is a cause of concern imo.

Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 7:48 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 4:14 pm Well, I don't know about you sir, but the fact we have people still alive in this country who have been alive longer than this country has been established is a cause of concern imo.

What the fuck are you talking about?

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 7:51 pm

Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 7:48 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 4:14 pm Well, I don't know about you sir, but the fact we have people still alive in this country who have been alive longer than this country has been established is a cause of concern imo.

What the fuck are you talking about?

Lol.

I'm referring to the age range of recipients in our social security database who are currently regarded as still alive. Apparently there are about 3,000 people in this country who are over 200 years old.

Lazerus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 7:54 pm
Oh ok lol


I saw your post and was like what lol
The oldest currently living person in the US is Naomi Whitehead, she’s 114.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:08 pm get yourself an age bucket and a copy of twilight. that person will certainly be unable to resist joining you.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:35 pm how do you eradicate transgenderism without eradicating trans people?

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:37 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:35 pm how do you eradicate transgenderism without eradicating trans people?

I think the point is too eradicate the ideology so future impressionable children won't be subjected to the idea and therefore result in a substantial decrease in people with gender dysphoria.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:42 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:37 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:35 pm how do you eradicate transgenderism without eradicating trans people?

I think the point is too eradicate the ideology so future impressionable children won't be subjected to the idea and therefore result in a substantial decrease in people with gender dysphoria.

so outlaw it again, basically. okay. that's why people think he's evil. and they're right to think that way.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:49 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:42 pm

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:37 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:35 pm how do you eradicate transgenderism without eradicating trans people?

I think the point is too eradicate the ideology so future impressionable children won't be subjected to the idea and therefore result in a substantial decrease in people with gender dysphoria.

so outlaw it again, basically. okay. that's why people think he's evil. and they're right to think that way.

I don't see him coming from a place of malice, truly. Which is why I think it's kind of tragic in a way that people who oppose this ideology believe they are evil. Gender dysphoria I'm sure is an incredibly painful thing, and if you take out the creeps and the opportunists who claim to be transgender and are left with those who are truly suffering from it then I personally have nothing but compassion and sympathy for them. So to me the idea of "eradicate" transgenderism is not transgender genocide, as the left believes, but rather to reduce the likelihood of future children suffering from the illness by no longer affirming it publicly.

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:54 pm i don't have any reason to believe that you're acting out of malice. but the many of the public figures that you agree with and share to others are acting, i believe, out of malice or maybe just extreme disregard or apathy. but it feels more active than that. so yeah.

Jason wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:57 pm

zombie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:54 pm i don't have any reason to believe that you're acting out of malice. but the many of the public figures that you agree with and share to others are acting, i believe, out of malice or maybe just extreme disregard or apathy. but it feels more active than that. so yeah.

Yeah, you could be right. They've dug more into the topic than I have personally and have worked on framing their argument far more than I have so it's just easier to cite their argument to get a better understanding of my point of view. This could be just another money grab for them with no regard for the opposing argument as long as they win. I can't argue that.