HorrorMovieFans.com

Hopefully McCaskill loses, which looks somewhat likely at the moment. Another one of those worthless, spineless Democrats.

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote: Blackburn wins in Tennessee. "Taylor Swift Effect" gained no steam, as expected. Only hurts Taylor in the long run: Reveals she actually buys into the wage gap nonsense, shills for the democrat and it made no difference.

couldn't that have just been how she felt politically, rather than "shilling"? she's a public figure, so it's gonna get reported. we saw trump at the polls. was he shilling? no.

She's shilling. If you believe the wage gap, and go out of your realm and into politics to tell the world you believe in it, and who to vote for, you are shilling. The wage gap is a myth, anyone half-retarded even knows this.

your profession should not preclude you from having an opinion beyond that profession. you're a truck driver by trade, no? you've told people how to vote. you've discussed myths and rumors and opinions as if they are fact. allow swift the same?

#1 I never tell people how to vote. I discuss politics privately within the confines of friendly discussion. If I become a celebrity athlete by some fluke, I am not going to shill for Trump.
#2 If I did it publicly, it wouldn't matter. I don't have influence over millions of young people. I am not a celebrity.

Taylor Swift has never had a job and has a net worth of nearly half a billion dollars, and she's claiming there is a wage gap.

Just very funny. The tether's been cut, she's no longer in the real world.

Jigsaw wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:It's a shame that so many atrocious Democrats are winning, and so many "leftists" are happy about it.

Happy that Gretchen Whitmer is Michigan's governor? Tim Kaine? Sherrod Brown? Bob fucking Casey? Every single one of these individuals is no ally of the left. And yet, "OMG THE REPUBLICNAS ARE WORSE VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO". God, Democrats are pathetic.

The alternative being . . .

Actual strong leftist candidates, not beholden to corporate interests or a corrupt political party.

That's not an alternative if 42 people are voting for them.

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote: Blackburn wins in Tennessee. "Taylor Swift Effect" gained no steam, as expected. Only hurts Taylor in the long run: Reveals she actually buys into the wage gap nonsense, shills for the democrat and it made no difference.

couldn't that have just been how she felt politically, rather than "shilling"? she's a public figure, so it's gonna get reported. we saw trump at the polls. was he shilling? no.

She's shilling. If you believe the wage gap, and go out of your realm and into politics to tell the world you believe in it, and who to vote for, you are shilling. The wage gap is a myth, anyone half-retarded even knows this.

your profession should not preclude you from having an opinion beyond that profession. you're a truck driver by trade, no? you've told people how to vote. you've discussed myths and rumors and opinions as if they are fact. allow swift the same?

#1 I never tell people how to vote. I discuss politics privately within the confines of friendly discussion. If I become a celebrity athlete by some fluke, I am not going to shill for Trump.
#2 If I did it publicly, it wouldn't matter. I don't have influence over millions of young people. I am not a celebrity.

if you can hold a celebrity's politics against them, then a celebrity can hold your politics against you. fair.

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote: Blackburn wins in Tennessee. "Taylor Swift Effect" gained no steam, as expected. Only hurts Taylor in the long run: Reveals she actually buys into the wage gap nonsense, shills for the democrat and it made no difference.

couldn't that have just been how she felt politically, rather than "shilling"? she's a public figure, so it's gonna get reported. we saw trump at the polls. was he shilling? no.

She's shilling. If you believe the wage gap, and go out of your realm and into politics to tell the world you believe in it, and who to vote for, you are shilling. The wage gap is a myth, anyone half-retarded even knows this.

your profession should not preclude you from having an opinion beyond that profession. you're a truck driver by trade, no? you've told people how to vote. you've discussed myths and rumors and opinions as if they are fact. allow swift the same?

#1 I never tell people how to vote. I discuss politics privately within the confines of friendly discussion. If I become a celebrity athlete by some fluke, I am not going to shill for Trump.
#2 If I did it publicly, it wouldn't matter. I don't have influence over millions of young people. I am not a celebrity.

if you can hold a celebrity's politics against them, then a celebrity can hold your politics against you. fair.

Oh, I'd love to have a private discussion with Taylor Swift on politics. It would not go very well for her. She's been hanging out with Lena Dunham, so I fear she might accuse me of rape for tearing down her platform so badly.

Headhunter wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:It's a shame that so many atrocious Democrats are winning, and so many "leftists" are happy about it.

Happy that Gretchen Whitmer is Michigan's governor? Tim Kaine? Sherrod Brown? Bob fucking Casey? Every single one of these individuals is no ally of the left. And yet, "OMG THE REPUBLICNAS ARE WORSE VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO". God, Democrats are pathetic.

The alternative being . . .

Actual strong leftist candidates, not beholden to corporate interests or a corrupt political party.

That's not an alternative if 42 people are voting for them.

Which is why we need to work harder to fix the broken ballot access laws that both Republicans and Democrats support. Voting Democratic, in most cases, is not an option if you want to move to a leftist society, as far as I can tell.

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote: Blackburn wins in Tennessee. "Taylor Swift Effect" gained no steam, as expected. Only hurts Taylor in the long run: Reveals she actually buys into the wage gap nonsense, shills for the democrat and it made no difference.

couldn't that have just been how she felt politically, rather than "shilling"? she's a public figure, so it's gonna get reported. we saw trump at the polls. was he shilling? no.

She's shilling. If you believe the wage gap, and go out of your realm and into politics to tell the world you believe in it, and who to vote for, you are shilling. The wage gap is a myth, anyone half-retarded even knows this.

your profession should not preclude you from having an opinion beyond that profession. you're a truck driver by trade, no? you've told people how to vote. you've discussed myths and rumors and opinions as if they are fact. allow swift the same?

#1 I never tell people how to vote. I discuss politics privately within the confines of friendly discussion. If I become a celebrity athlete by some fluke, I am not going to shill for Trump.
#2 If I did it publicly, it wouldn't matter. I don't have influence over millions of young people. I am not a celebrity.

if you can hold a celebrity's politics against them, then a celebrity can hold your politics against you. fair.

Oh, I'd love to have a private discussion with Taylor Swift on politics. It would not go very well for her. She's been hanging out with Lena Dunham, so I fear she might accuse me of rape for tearing down her platform so badly.

i know. you probably would be better able to articulate and back up your views. you're holier than her now, because she voted the wrong way was my point.

Jigsaw wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:It's a shame that so many atrocious Democrats are winning, and so many "leftists" are happy about it.

Happy that Gretchen Whitmer is Michigan's governor? Tim Kaine? Sherrod Brown? Bob fucking Casey? Every single one of these individuals is no ally of the left. And yet, "OMG THE REPUBLICNAS ARE WORSE VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO". God, Democrats are pathetic.

The alternative being . . .

Actual strong leftist candidates, not beholden to corporate interests or a corrupt political party.

That's not an alternative if 42 people are voting for them.

Which is why we need to work harder to fix the broken ballot access laws that both Republicans and Democrats support. Voting Democratic, in most cases, is not an option if you want to move to a leftist society, as far as I can tell.

Clearly nobody wants to be anywhere near as far left as you except those other 42 weirdos. And 38 of them are voting just to be rebellious.

I fully expect Beto will be the Democrats' guy for 2020, if he wants it.

Wtf is going on in Mississippi

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote:

zombie wrote:

Jason wrote: Blackburn wins in Tennessee. "Taylor Swift Effect" gained no steam, as expected. Only hurts Taylor in the long run: Reveals she actually buys into the wage gap nonsense, shills for the democrat and it made no difference.

couldn't that have just been how she felt politically, rather than "shilling"? she's a public figure, so it's gonna get reported. we saw trump at the polls. was he shilling? no.

She's shilling. If you believe the wage gap, and go out of your realm and into politics to tell the world you believe in it, and who to vote for, you are shilling. The wage gap is a myth, anyone half-retarded even knows this.

your profession should not preclude you from having an opinion beyond that profession. you're a truck driver by trade, no? you've told people how to vote. you've discussed myths and rumors and opinions as if they are fact. allow swift the same?

#1 I never tell people how to vote. I discuss politics privately within the confines of friendly discussion. If I become a celebrity athlete by some fluke, I am not going to shill for Trump.
#2 If I did it publicly, it wouldn't matter. I don't have influence over millions of young people. I am not a celebrity.

if you can hold a celebrity's politics against them, then a celebrity can hold your politics against you. fair.

Oh, I'd love to have a private discussion with Taylor Swift on politics. It would not go very well for her. She's been hanging out with Lena Dunham, so I fear she might accuse me of rape for tearing down her platform so badly.

i know. you probably would be better able to articulate and back up your views. you're holier than her now, because she voted the wrong way was my point.

I don't care how you vote. All she's given me is that she believes the wage gap myth, which can be dismantled by any idiot in 20 seconds. And if she is like 99.999% of all other leftist celebrities, she would think of me as a racist nazi-sympathizer who is not worthy of her presence. Hope that's not the case, but I won't lose any sleep.

Headhunter wrote:I fully expect Beto will be the Democrats' guy for 2020, if he wants it.

He has to beat Cruz. If he loses to Cruz it won't be him.

Jason wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:It's a shame that so many atrocious Democrats are winning, and so many "leftists" are happy about it.

Happy that Gretchen Whitmer is Michigan's governor? Tim Kaine? Sherrod Brown? Bob fucking Casey? Every single one of these individuals is no ally of the left. And yet, "OMG THE REPUBLICNAS ARE WORSE VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO". God, Democrats are pathetic.

The alternative being . . .

Actual strong leftist candidates, not beholden to corporate interests or a corrupt political party.

That's not an alternative if 42 people are voting for them.

Which is why we need to work harder to fix the broken ballot access laws that both Republicans and Democrats support. Voting Democratic, in most cases, is not an option if you want to move to a leftist society, as far as I can tell.

Clearly nobody wants to be anywhere near as far left as you except those other 42 weirdos. And 38 of them are voting just to be rebellious.

I don't see how you can determine that. If these candidates were actually allowed in the debates, then it's fair to say that more people would vote for them. However, neither the Republicans nor Democrats would benefit from that, so they have no interest in doing so.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:I fully expect Beto will be the Democrats' guy for 2020, if he wants it.

He has to beat Cruz. If he loses to Cruz it won't be him.

Cruz was called the winner something like an hour ago, if not more.

Jason wrote:
I don't care how you vote. All she's given me is that she believes the wage gap myth, which can be dismantled by any idiot in 20 seconds. And if she is like 99.999% of all other leftist celebrities, she would think of me as a racist nazi-sympathizer who is not worthy of her presence. Hope that's not the case, but I won't lose any sleep.

hope she wouldn't do that to you. i hope you can let go of doing that to her, out of your own political viewpoint.

Jigsaw wrote:

Jason wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:

Headhunter wrote:

Jigsaw wrote:It's a shame that so many atrocious Democrats are winning, and so many "leftists" are happy about it.

Happy that Gretchen Whitmer is Michigan's governor? Tim Kaine? Sherrod Brown? Bob fucking Casey? Every single one of these individuals is no ally of the left. And yet, "OMG THE REPUBLICNAS ARE WORSE VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO". God, Democrats are pathetic.

The alternative being . . .

Actual strong leftist candidates, not beholden to corporate interests or a corrupt political party.

That's not an alternative if 42 people are voting for them.

Which is why we need to work harder to fix the broken ballot access laws that both Republicans and Democrats support. Voting Democratic, in most cases, is not an option if you want to move to a leftist society, as far as I can tell.

Clearly nobody wants to be anywhere near as far left as you except those other 42 weirdos. And 38 of them are voting just to be rebellious.

I don't see how you can determine that. If these candidates were actually allowed in the debates, then it's fair to say that more people would vote for them. However, neither the Republicans nor Democrats would benefit from that, so they have no interest in doing so.

Would love to see them in more debates.

Gary Johnson: "What is Syria?"
Jill Stein: "Who cares? We need to graffiti shit."

hulu looks to have all of the pre-craig bond films. awesome.

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:I fully expect Beto will be the Democrats' guy for 2020, if he wants it.

He has to beat Cruz. If he loses to Cruz it won't be him.

A close loss to Cruz is exactly the scenario in which he becomes the guy. What he's done in Texas to make it a close race is a win in itself, and now he can put all his energy into presidential aspirations.

Texas is pretty much a purple state at this point and he accelerated that timeline.

Jigsaw wrote:

Jason wrote:

Headhunter wrote:I fully expect Beto will be the Democrats' guy for 2020, if he wants it.

He has to beat Cruz. If he loses to Cruz it won't be him.

Cruz was called the winner something like an hour ago, if not more.

I know. But its still reporting. And I heard he's devastated, like he actually expected to beat Cruz or something.

"Beta O'Male" is gonna make the rounds on the internet and it will crush his campaign, anyway. lol.